marc fleury wrote: > We would create the interceptors independently of each other. And then > "creating a stack" is nothing more than instructing incoming gates (.net, > rmi, whatever) that the messages requesting "EJB-style" fielding should go > through this stack of ObjectName interceptors. standardjboss.xml needs to > map one on one there.
Well, the only thing the incoming gates would have to know is to immediately delegate to the stack configuration MBean. After that it can take care of the stack config. *But this will only work if the interceptor/config interleaving is done as outlined in previous post*. Otherwise it will be an MBean explosion... > The stack of state machines, the movie seen by the MI, is a random access > stack from the point of view of the admin. > > Then updating the flow means talking to that "route mapper" at the gates. Which, as discussed, need to be hand-holding the MI as it travels along the stack. /R -- Rickard Öberg Software Development Specialist xlurc - Xpedio Linköping Ubiquitous Research Center Author of "Mastering RMI" Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
