Rickard talked about something called postRegister? > -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 4:50 PM > To: David Jencks > Cc: Sacha Labourey; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Bill Burke > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: Deployment exception on Clustering > > > Hi David > > You hear it. How can be use init() again for Clustering ? > > Andy > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Burke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Andreas Schaefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Sacha Labourey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 1:10 PM > Subject: [JBoss-dev] RE: Deployment exception on Clustering > > > > Yes this a very serious problem and it wouldn't show up with your Farm > > stuff. THis is my fault because I didn't document the code > very well, but > > can we please switch this back? > > > > In the init phase, all services register with the cluster (HAPartition) > for > > cluster events that want to listen to and also if they require state > > synchronization. In the start phase, the ClusterPartition > mbean does the > > final Connect to the JavaGroups message Channel. When the Connect > happens, > > state synchronization starts. Services will not have their state > > synchronized if everything is done in the start phase. > > > > Bill > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Andreas Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 3:50 PM > > > To: Bill Burke > > > Cc: Sacha Labourey; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: Deployment exception on Clustering > > > > > > > > > Hi Bill > > > > > > I added all the code from init() into start(). Is this a problem ? > > > > > > At least when I use the Farm it works like a charm. > > > > > > Andy > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Bill Burke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > "Andreas Schaefer" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Cc: "Sacha Labourey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 12:59 PM > > > Subject: RE: Deployment exception on Clustering > > > > > > > > > > Guys, > > > > > > > > The clustering stuff is dependent on init and start both being > > > there. Can > > > > we put back the init? Otherwise you break our stuff. Why are you > doing > > > > this anyways? > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 2:33 PM > > > > > To: Andreas Schaefer > > > > > Cc: David Jencks; Bill Burke; Sacha Labourey; > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: Re: Deployment exception on Clustering > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, must have missed that one. > > > > > > > > > > I generally copied the init[Service] code and put it in > start[Service] > > > at > > > > > the beginning, similarly for destroy. > > > > > > > > > > As far as I could tell, everything covered by the > testsuite works as > > > well > > > > > after the changes as before. > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know of other problems. > > > > > > > > > > The Service interface still has init and destroy since these are > used > > > > > heavily in the interceptor chain. I think they are > unnecessary, but > > > won't > > > > > have time to try to change them for a while. This could probably > > > > > be a part > > > > > if turning the interceptor chains into mbeans. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > david jencks > > > > > > > > > > On 2001.11.12 14:13:41 -0500 Andreas Schaefer wrote: > > > > > > Hi David > > > > > > > > > > > > The ClusterPartition.java class is not started correctly > > > > > > because now init() is not called anymore and therefore > > > > > > the JavaGroups JChannel are not initialized. > > > > > > > > > > > > I will go ahead and fix it but maybe there are other MBeans > > > > > > out there which needs attention, too. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx > > > > > > > > > > > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Andreas Schaefer > > > > > > Senior Consultant > > > > > > JBoss Group, LLC > > > > > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > >
_______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
