Excellent idea.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
> Dillon
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] more jmx domain structure
>
>
> Again, quick thought...
>
> Was thinking that we might want to change the way we use JMX
> domain names.
> Right now we have something like this:
>
>    Adaptor
>    J2EE
>    JBOSS-SYSTEM
>    JBossMQ
>    JCA
>    JMImplementation
>    JMX
>    Jetty
>    Security
>    SingleJBoss
>    ZClassLoaders
>
> This does not really show which bits are specific to JBoss, which
> are part
> of the JMX reference impl and which bits might be user components.  So, I
> was thinking something more DNS like:
>
>    jboss.system
>    jboss.system.classloaders
>    jboss.mq
>    jboss.jmx
>    jboss.jmx.adaptor
>    jboss.jca
>    jboss.j2ee
>    jboss.security
>    jboss.management
>    jboss.web
>
> Then users might specify components like:
>
>    user.mydomain
>    user.mydomain.subdomain
>
> I think that this would work for querying jmx names too, like say
> you wanted
> to see all of hte jboss.system domains & components, you might be able to
> use "jboss.system.*:*"
>
> --jason
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>



_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to