Hi "SingleJBoss" comes from my JSR-77 implementation. It can be that this is hardcoded but I am not quite sure. Will investigate it next week when I am back.
See ya - Andy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:25 PM Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] more jmx domain structure > I just finished commiting this. I was unable to change the > 'SingleJBoss' or the 'JMImplementation' domains, so I left them as they > were. I don't know where the later even gets set. I tried changing > SingleJBoss, but it is not as straight forward as the others I changed. > > Currently the default build has the follwing domains: > > JMImplementation > SingleJBoss > jboss.j2ee > jboss.jca > jboss.jmx > jboss.mq > jboss.mq.destination > jboss.security > jboss.system > jboss.system.classloader > jboss.web > jboss > > Where everything that did not fit into a specific domain went into > jboss. > > It was a bit trickier than I had expected to make the change, as some > compoinents did not check to make sure they had valid references to > objects and throw some rather unhelpful exceptions. I have added some > more detail to some of those areas to help avoid this in the future. > > I am still running into cluster related exceptions as well as some > strange Remote and RMI exceptions... not really sure why... don't think > they are related to the domain name change though. > > Components (like the Axis stuff) which are not part of the default tests > may need a little help, though I really tried to update all names so it > might just work. > > Happy new year. > > --jason > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:21 PM > To: Jason Dillon; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] more jmx domain structure > > Excellent idea. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Jason > > Dillon > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:08 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [JBoss-dev] more jmx domain structure > > > > > > Again, quick thought... > > > > Was thinking that we might want to change the way we use JMX > > domain names. > > Right now we have something like this: > > > > Adaptor > > J2EE > > JBOSS-SYSTEM > > JBossMQ > > JCA > > JMImplementation > > JMX > > Jetty > > Security > > SingleJBoss > > ZClassLoaders > > > > This does not really show which bits are specific to JBoss, which > > are part > > of the JMX reference impl and which bits might be user components. > So, I > > was thinking something more DNS like: > > > > jboss.system > > jboss.system.classloaders > > jboss.mq > > jboss.jmx > > jboss.jmx.adaptor > > jboss.jca > > jboss.j2ee > > jboss.security > > jboss.management > > jboss.web > > > > Then users might specify components like: > > > > user.mydomain > > user.mydomain.subdomain > > > > I think that this would work for querying jmx names too, like say > > you wanted > > to see all of hte jboss.system domains & components, you might be able > to > > use "jboss.system.*:*" > > > > --jason > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
