> > > o Renamed 'messaging' to 'mq'. I don't know what I was thinking before > > > when I used messaging. Sorry. > > > > > Messaging is a better name than mq. > > I figured the jbossmq folks would want something mq-like back. I > personally don't care too much... just had trouble typing messaging.
I just re-read this and it sounds like I was just aimlessly changing names, which I was not... though now that I think about it my reasons for changing were not really solid enough to make the change. Basically, messaging led me to think that all jms related bits should go there... but that really isn't possible or desirable. This leaded me to change the name back to mq, as in jbossmq... but I hope to eventually re-org the cvs repository (later) under jboss/* (so that cvs update will work as expected) and I was hoping to avoid jboss/jboss* names. So, I just wanted to comment that I did have a reason, which did make some sense, or else I would have not put in the effort. Though I do realize now that it does not really matter either way. --jason _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
