You are right. I had a momentary lapse of reason (that lasted for more than a moment actually).
I still think that we should find a better name for the j2ee module, but there is only real motivation to do that if we move the jmx and other apis in there too. My apologies for my lack of sensibility on this matter. I will have it fixed shortly. --jason On Sun, 2002-02-17 at 00:24, Scott M Stark wrote: > All these name changes are basically just screwing around > with semantic trivialities. Change these names back: > > mq -> messaging > resource -> connector > plastic -> j2ee > > and do not make any more name changes without discussing > why it is necessary. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 11:46 PM > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] **README** - 'jboss-all' Structure > Changes -**README** > > > > On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 23:29, Scott M Stark wrote: > > > > > > > > o Renamed 'messaging' to 'mq'. I don't know what I was thinking > before > > > > when I used messaging. Sorry. > > > > > > > Messaging is a better name than mq. > > > > I figured the jbossmq folks would want something mq-like back. I > > personally don't care too much... just had trouble typing messaging. > > > > > > o Renamed 'connector' to 'resource' for clarity. > > > > > > > Connector is more clearly associated with the JCA than resource. > > > Leave this as connector. > > > > JCA uses javax.resource.* for its packaging. They really should have > > called it JRCA, since it is for connecting resources. > > > > If you don't mind I would like to keep it as resource, as it makes it > > more logically to house standard adapters there. > > > > Basically its just a name, so I don't care too much. I only made these > > changes because I thought that the current names were poor for what > > types of bits live in them. > > > > > > o Renamed 'j2ee' to 'plastic' for clarity and to keep folks from > > > > thinking that is a j2ee impl. It is just a module to hold our own > > > > imitation/synthetic/copy/plastic versions of Sun's API's > > > > > > > What has plastic to do with standard j2ee interfaces? These are > > > getting to be riduculous name changes so knock it off and change > > > plastic back to j2ee. > > > > I figured someone was going to say something about this. I had noticed > > that we are now providing JMX interfaces in a similar style to the j2ee > > interfaces. Perhaps we will do the same in the future as well. So in > > comes plastic, which is a module which only serves to hold these > > implementations. > > > > Perhaps I had picked up a little bit of an urge to have some spiffy > > macosx-like names from looking over the apple website lately. > > > > If you feel strongly about reverting I will. > > > > --jason > > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
