thanks...

without wanting to be picky... any chance of updating the jboss.xml dtd to allow the 
local-jndi-name?  If there's a reason why this
isn't so, then that reason would also be fine (o:  Just as part of XDoclet we validate 
the generated XML, and we cant do this for
jboss.xml atm because the DTD doesn't agree with what we want...

cheesr
dim

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ejb-local-ref broken?


> I'll fix the AbstractWebContainer so forget about the patch.
>
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Scott Stark
> Chief Technology Officer
> JBoss Group, LLC
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dmitri Colebatch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ejb-local-ref broken?
>
>
> > If its from the web-tier, AbstractWebContainer assumes that the local
> interface is bound to local/{remote_interface_name} in JNDI.
> > I thought I'd submitted a patch last night for this (to look for
> local-jndi-name in jboss.xml), but I cant see it on sf now... I'll
> > post it again tonight (from home).
> >
> > otoh if it isn't from the web tier then this will have nothing to do with
> it (o:
> >
> > cheesr
> > dim
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to