Again we can take care of this at the proxy (the one to JNP) level. I will look into it, always wanted to
marcf |-----Original Message----- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill |Burke |Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:03 AM |To: David Jencks; jboss-dev |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Is it necessary to store Proxies in serialized |form in jndi? (jboss 3) | | |In my experience so far, Home's are looked up only once on the client and |cached, so I agree with you David. Proxies shouldn't be serialized into |JNDI. | |Bill | |> -----Original Message----- |> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David |> Jencks |> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:48 PM |> To: jboss-dev |> Subject: [JBoss-dev] Is it necessary to store Proxies in serialized form |> in jndi? (jboss 3) |> |> |> It appears that in jboss 3, cvs, proxies for home interfaces are being |> bound into jndi as serialized, MarshalledObjects. Is this |necessary? This |> appears to result in deserialization on every jndi lookup. While this |> speeds up remote access, it slows down local access. I think we want to |> favor local access over remote access. |> |> Would using an ObjectFactory work for remote access? |> |> Is it possible to somehow use an ObjectFactory for local access and a |> preserialized form for remote access? |> |> _______________________________________________ |> Jboss-development mailing list |> [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development | | |_______________________________________________ |Jboss-development mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
