On 2002.02.20 15:39:01 -0500 Juha Lindfors wrote: > > that's great but why 2 servers. Can't we just keep > > the two views and the single resource? > > yes you can... it is a matter of taste I guess. Do you want to > differentiate your MBeans by object names (different names for same > service depending on view) or do you want to use the same object name for > your service, just the view changes depending on which server instance > you connect to. > > > > Actually... wouldn't that separate the views for > > tools as well? like 8082 > > would just see the admin one and the comp one would > > be internal... > > yes that it would do. Although tools supporting visibility attributes per > mbean in a single server would be trivial to code as well.
I think an argument for keeping it in one mbean server is that the admin interface needs to affect the operational interface. e.g., when an mbean representing an ejb is "Stopped", ejb invocations should be blocked somehow. I think this can best be done entirely in interceptors: communication between interceptors in one mbean server seems easier to manage than between 2: maybe we could use mbean notifications. david jencks > > -- Juha > > > > > _________________________________________________________ > View thread online: http://main.jboss.org/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=8538 > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
