Come on Marc... this is real. I am thinking about the future, making better usage of JMX and providing a better system for intercomponent communication w/o messging up user management.
I asume your previous email means that it is starting to sink in... MBus is a great name too =) --jason marc fleury wrote: >What are you guys talking about? this is busy-work, there are a thousand >things to do before we create different domains for talking and managing. >Stay real. > >marcf > > >|-----Original Message----- >|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason >|Dillon >|Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 4:39 PM >|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Multipule MBeanServers >| >| >|I would agree if we could vary the interfaces, ie. specify one mbean >|interface for the inter-component bus and one for admin. >| >|--jason >| >| >|On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 16:25, Scott M Stark wrote: >|> This sounds like a good example for using two MBeanServers. One >|for administration and one for messaging between components. > > >_______________________________________________ >Jboss-development mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
