All developers would not be required to use it. Both will intermix freely. Jython has tight integration with Java (partly because it is written in java, but also because it allows jythin to use java classes directly).
I think that jython may make it easier to write simple effective tests... but there is still the chance of poor tests... but that has little todo with jython or java for that matter. I will provide some examples as time goes on... need to implement it first though =) --jason David Jencks wrote: >I'd like to see some more evidence of good things before we required all >developers to learn a new language before they could work on jboss. How >about a comparison between a well written java test and a badly written >jython one -- if poeple are learning a new language, the first efforts may >not be so good. > > >david jencks > > >On 2002.02.24 00:33:48 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote: > >>I have been thinking about writting some magic to make it possible to >>use junit-like jython scripts, intermixed with regular junit tests where >>needed for typed reasons. I am currious what others think about it. >> >>Basicially a Jything test case can do the same as a regular java test >>case in about 1/3 the code (sometimes even less)... thus making it >>easier and faster to write them. Still need to have a method to execute >>regular tests too, when jythons type masking gets in the way. >> >>Shouldn't been too hard to get it working ... anyways, any thoughts? >> >>--jason >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Jboss-development mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >Jboss-development mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
