oh good point, but that doesn't require "top level" configuration, just drop the iiop and jrmp and webservices and bla bla bla and it is all invocable, it won't require configuration...
good point, missed my own vision :) in other words francisco the 3.0 implementation of detached invokers superseeds this, it needs a few tweeks in the factories (as we need multiple homes) but we are almost there, he he marcf |-----Original Message----- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill |Burke |Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 7:47 AM |To: Scott M Stark; [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Multiple server configurations | | |In other words, one EJB can be accessible through IIOP, RMI, SOAP, XML-RPC |all at the same time. This is the future. Multiple MBean |invokers, 1 MBean |as per Marc's vision. | |Bill | |> -----Original Message----- |> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott |> M Stark |> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:33 AM |> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Multiple server configurations |> |> |> We will support multiple container invokers such that any |> number of access protocols are available so being able to |> run multiple configurations is not how this should be done. |> |> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |> Scott Stark |> Chief Technology Officer |> JBoss Group, LLC |> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |> ----- Original Message ----- |> From: "Francisco Reverbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:10 PM |> Subject: [JBoss-dev] Multiple server configurations |> |> |> > While working on the IIOP module, I have used an "IIOP server |> > configuration" that turns IIOP into the default. |> > |> > Let me put it more clearly: by default, EJBs are deployed in a |> > JRMP container. If I want an EJB to be deployed in an IIOP container, |> > I must add to its jboss.xml file an element like |> > |> > <configuration-name>IIOP Stateless SessionBean</configuration-name> |> > |> > To avoid doing this for many EJBs, I created a special server |> > configuration. This configuration has a modified standardjboss.xml, |> > in which IIOP container configurations have "standard" |> > container-names: "Standard Stateless SessionBean", and so on. |> > JRMP container configurations have "non-standard" container-names: |> > "JRMP Stateless SessionBean", and so on. |> > |> |> |> |> _______________________________________________ |> Jboss-development mailing list |> [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development | | |_______________________________________________ |Jboss-development mailing list |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
