jacOrb is gerald bose, information is on the website :) ping me directly
marcf |-----Original Message----- |From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:35 PM |To: Francisco Reverbel |Cc: marc fleury; Scott M Stark; [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Multiple server configurations | | | | |> -----Original Message----- |> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of |> Francisco Reverbel |> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:11 PM |> To: Bill Burke |> Cc: marc fleury; Scott M Stark; [EMAIL PROTECTED] |> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Multiple server configurations |> |> |> Hello Bill, |> |> > > From: Francisco Reverbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] |> ... |> > > Must embed the container's JMX name into my IORs and route IIOP |> > > invocations through the MBean server. This has been in my todo |> > > list for quite a while... |> > > |> > |> > Is this portable? Can other orbs just ignore the extra JMX |> name. I can't |> > remember whether or not you can stuff anything you like in the |> IOR contexts. |> |> Yes, it is fully portable. I will not use an IOR context, will use the |> IOR object id instead. |> | |So, you can't add abitrary IOR contexts? | |> Every IOR has an "object id" field interpreted only by the server that |> created the IOR. Nobody else looks at it. A server can put whatever it |> wants into the object id field of the IORs it creates. |> |> > Another thing sort of related....I haven't been in the CORBA space for |> > over...But how's the fault-tolerance spec progressing? Can you stuff |> > multiple endpoints into 1 IOR for failover? Do other orbs |> recognize this? |> |> Yes, the spec allows you to stuff multiple endpoints within one IOR. |> If I remember correctly, it introduces the concepts of "object group" |> and "group IOR". But I do not know of any ORBs have implemented this |> feature in a spec-compliant way. Maybe it is just my ignorance, I am |> not following this issue very closely. |> |> Changing subject a little bit... |> |> Have you clustering guys thought about clustering and IIOP? Seems to be a | |Yes :). Wanted to know if ORB's supported "object groups". How will we do |failover if Orbix, TAO, and/or JacORB don't support this feature? I was |hoping that JBoss clustering could support failover for even C++ CORBA |clients. I'll ping my friends at Iona. Anybody know the JacORB or TAO |guys? Iona/Jac/TAO are the main dudes, right? | |> very good match. I believe IIOP runs a bit faster than JRMP for remote |> invocations. (For local invocations, JBoss optimized calls are |> unbeatable.) |> And you could use the IIOP "location forward" mechanism to do load |> balancing at the IIOP level. You can send a "location forward" |> reply to an |> IIOP client at any time. The client will transparently continue its work |> using the new location. |> | |location forward is a good idea. | |Bill _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
