Hmmm, I thought that might be what the spec wanted, but when I read it I decided it was consistent with "put everything in sight on the classpath" since then everything they mention is definitely on the classpath. Maybe we need a configuration switch? What problems come from "everything in sight?" If you have server-specific jars, you'd need to change the ear anyway to change which are deployed, so why not take out the packages you don't want deployed?
Any other thoughts? david jencks On 2002.04.16 17:01:13 -0400 lsanders wrote: > It was my patch that changed this. I changed the EARDeployer to only > deploy > those applications listed in an application.xml file (I believe that this > was another bug on sourceforge?). The struts.jar should only be included > on > the classpath if it is an application in the application.xml file, if it > is > in the WEB-INF/lib, or if it is listed in a Class-Path entry in the > META-INF > file. I believe this is how the spec defines things. Is this right? > > -Larry > > > > Bugs item #544848, was opened at 2002-04-16 15:19 > > You can respond by visiting: > > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=544848&group_id= > 22866 > > > > Category: None > > Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole > > Status: Open > > Resolution: None > > Priority: 5 > > Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec) > > Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) > > Summary: EAR Deployments don't work the same > > > > Initial Comment: > > with jboss3.0rc1 with tomcat4.0.3 if I create an ear > > file such as this: > > > > one.war > > two.war > > struts.jar > > META-INF/application.xml > > > > where one.war and two.war depend on structs.jar, jboss > > blows up when one.war attempts to preload the structs > > servlet. > > > > with jboss3.0b1 with tomcat4.0.3, the above > > configuration worked perfectly. > > > > was this intentionally changed? or is it a bug? > > > > if i use the "Class-Path" entry to specify the > > structs.jar file in the manifest file for both one.war > > and two.war it also works. I've only tested this on > > rc1. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > You can respond by visiting: > > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=544848&group_id= > 22866 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
