Does the testsuite cover these? --jason
Quoting Hunter Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I think some part of them is not marked as serializable... > > > From: Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 17:41:19 -0700 > > To: Stephen Coy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Stateful Session Beans are not EJB2.0 yet > > > > Any clue why they fail? > > > > --jason > > > > > > Quoting Stephen Coy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I raised a bug (#541855) about this a while ago, which has met a > >> distressing amount of silence. > >> > >> In short, stateful session beans fail to passivate if they have > >> EJBLocalObject or EJBLocalHome objects as instance fields. Therefore, > >> they fail to comply with 7.4.1 of the EJB 2.0 spec. > >> > >> I would tackle fixing this myself, but I don't yet know my way around > >> inside the guts of JBoss well enough yet. Maybe one of the gurus can > >> spend ten or fifteen minutes describing how to go about it - and then > >> I'll be happy to write and test the implementation. > >> > >> Stephen Coy > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Jboss-development mailing list > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > >> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > > This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
