What problem are you trying to solve marc? You haven't indicated anything that doesn't work except your personal ordering preference. What actual deployment problem are you seeing right now with the current code? I haven't seen you say "this can't be done easily with the current code", just "I haven't taken the time to find out how the deployment works or test it, and my pet idea isn't implemented, so I'm going to bitch"
What doesn't work now???? give an example! david jencks On 2002.04.21 13:37:59 -0400 marc fleury wrote: > Ok you guys just talk without end and the simplest solution is still not > done, > > I will have to do it just so that we have something that works. > > Just pisses me off > > marcf > > |-----Original Message----- > |From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > |Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 9:45 AM > |To: marc fleury > |Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |Subject: Re: WTF??? was RE: [JBoss-dev] SAR... Sucky ARchive ? > | > | > |<snip the rant> > |> Ok I am really tired of everything/everyone DOES THE SIMPLE NUMBERING > OF > |> DEPLOYMENTS WORK??? I WANT A YES/NO ANSWER. > |> > |> If I do 01first.sar and 02second.war do I get 01 first and 02 second? > |> > |> YES=NO > |> > |> ? > | > | > |umm YES != No > | > |the answer is NO > | > |If you want deployments in a specific order list them in that order in > the > |deployment scanner mbean. Otherwise we get into nonsense about > conflicts > |between packaged type order and explicit alphabetical order --> you are > |forced to use alphabetical order even if you don't need it. > Alphabetical > |order might look nice at first but it is really baddddd IMO. > | > |remember mbeans wait for their classes now... solves a lot of ordering > |problems. > | > |david jencks > > > _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
