Hi Jason > How and when is this a problem? The two servers will be sharing a JNDI > server then? When does this happen and who uses JBoss in this fashion. It > seems like there might be more snags than just the placement of the RMI > adapter.
The JMX Connectors are not written for JBoss specific. Because JMX allows you to have more than one MBeanServer per JVM and there is a good chance that a box have more than one JVM running this is not so far fetched. Especially when an external JNDI server is used. > Ic. I was confused because the javadoc mention that this is done because of > the JMX spec (hence the first part of my mail wanting to know what the spec > was). Spec. doesn't say anything about it. > If that is the case and there is no spec then we should default to a scheme > which is easier for us to work with and which will be acceptable for most of > our users. For the small subset that need RMI Adapters bound into JNDI for > more than one server we can let them decide how to arrange them by making the > name bound under configurable (as it is currently hard coded to this pattern > with the local hostname). As I said JMX Connector were not designed for JBoss. Andy _______________________________________________________________ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
