The only way I can think of to do this would be to use proxies, where
the IH has a reference to the version specific impl.

--jason



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss
> 
> I don't see how to compile something on 1.3 that calls a method that
is
> not
> in the jdbc 2 spec, but if you have a reference to an example of how
to do
> what you suggest I'll take a look.
> 
> IMO reflection is worse than a preprocessor.
> 
> david jencks
> 
> On 2002.06.18 16:34:24 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote:
> > Can this be implemented using a bridge pattern to allow the version
> > specific code to vary from VM to VM as specified by the Java version
the
> > VM supports?
> >
> > This would be better IMO than use a preprocessor.
> >
> > --jason
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:42 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss
> > >
> > > compile on jdk 1.4, the local wrapper gets the 1.4 jdbc 3
> > >
> > > compile on jdk 1.3, you get jdbc 2
> > >
> > > done with ant filtering to put/not put comments around jdbc 3
code.
> > >
> > > I think the xa stuff doesn't wrap the stuff with jdbc 2 to 3
changes.
> > >
> > > david jencks
> > >
> > > On 2002.06.18 12:12:30 -0400 Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> > > > How are we handling JDK 1.4 use in JBoss?  I want to use some of
the
> > new
> > > > JDBC 3.0 APIs, but they are only in JDK 1.4.
> > > >
> > > > We still need to support JDK 1.3 for a long time, so how are we
> > handling
> > > > this.
> > > >
> > > > -dain
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Dain Sundstrom
> > > > Chief Architect JBossCMP
> > > > JBoss Group, LLC
> > > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----
> > > >                    Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy
> > > >                       >>>     http://thinkgeek.com/sf    <<<
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Jboss-development mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> > > --
> > >                    Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy
> > >                    >>>     http://thinkgeek.com/sf    <<<
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Jboss-development mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
> >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> >                    Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy
> >                    >>>     http://thinkgeek.com/sf    <<<
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jboss-development mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
> >
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> --
>                    Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy
>                    >>>     http://thinkgeek.com/sf    <<<
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy
                   >>>     http://thinkgeek.com/sf    <<<

_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to