It is a trade off, either complex build or fancy proxy-bridge system. I think it would be in our interest to figure out a way to do the later, as we will always have to deal with this shit.
Better that then releasing a JBoss-Java-1.3 and JBoss-Java-1.4 + all of the JBoss variants. That is ridiculous. --jason > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 3:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss > > Doing something fancy for this is ridiculous-- its in a jca adapter that > wraps a jdbc driver. We should just compile one for each jdk version and > by default use the one for jdk 1.3. > > Is it easy to compile both in one run? > > david jencks > > On 2002.06.18 17:54:53 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: > > The only way I can think of to do this would be to use proxies, where > > the IH has a reference to the version specific impl. > > > > --jason > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:05 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss > > > > > > I don't see how to compile something on 1.3 that calls a method that > > is > > > not > > > in the jdbc 2 spec, but if you have a reference to an example of how > > to do > > > what you suggest I'll take a look. > > > > > > IMO reflection is worse than a preprocessor. > > > > > > david jencks > > > > > > On 2002.06.18 16:34:24 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: > > > > Can this be implemented using a bridge pattern to allow the version > > > > specific code to vary from VM to VM as specified by the Java version > > the > > > > VM supports? > > > > > > > > This would be better IMO than use a preprocessor. > > > > > > > > --jason > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 12:42 PM > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDK 1.4 use in JBoss > > > > > > > > > > compile on jdk 1.4, the local wrapper gets the 1.4 jdbc 3 > > > > > > > > > > compile on jdk 1.3, you get jdbc 2 > > > > > > > > > > done with ant filtering to put/not put comments around jdbc 3 > > code. > > > > > > > > > > I think the xa stuff doesn't wrap the stuff with jdbc 2 to 3 > > changes. > > > > > > > > > > david jencks > > > > > > > > > > On 2002.06.18 12:12:30 -0400 Dain Sundstrom wrote: > > > > > > How are we handling JDK 1.4 use in JBoss? I want to use some of > > the > > > > new > > > > > > JDBC 3.0 APIs, but they are only in JDK 1.4. > > > > > > > > > > > > We still need to support JDK 1.3 for a long time, so how are we > > > > handling > > > > > > this. > > > > > > > > > > > > -dain > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Dain Sundstrom > > > > > > Chief Architect JBossCMP > > > > > > JBoss Group, LLC > > > > > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > ---- > > > > > > Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy > > > > > > >>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf <<< > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Jboss-development mailing list > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > -- > > > > > -- > > > > > Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy > > > > > >>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf <<< > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Jboss-development mailing list > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ---- > > > > Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy > > > > >>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf <<< > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Jboss-development mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > > > -- > > > Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy > > > >>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf <<< > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Jboss-development mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ---- > > Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy > > >>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf <<< > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- > -- > Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy > >>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf <<< > > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy >>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf <<< _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
