Its just a category name. It does not make sense to have a core component using a category outside of the org.jboss namespace.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jules Gosnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:17 AM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with JBossWeb logger category? > That might be seen as implying that it IS a classname, when it is not. > > does anyone else have an opinion on this ? > > the real solution would be to integrate even more tightly (i.e. > completely replace) with Jetty's logging. > > I'll think about how this might be achieved. > > > Jules > > > > Jason Dillon wrote: > > I think we should prefix this with org.jboss.<something> so that > > limiting org.jboss will function as expected. > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Two, two, TWO treats in one. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
