OK - is everyone happy with org.jboss.jbossweb ? Jules
Scott M Stark wrote: > Its just a category name. It does not make sense to have a > core component using a category outside of the org.jboss > namespace. > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Scott Stark > Chief Technology Officer > JBoss Group, LLC > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jules Gosnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:17 AM > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with JBossWeb logger category? > > > >>That might be seen as implying that it IS a classname, when it is not. >> >>does anyone else have an opinion on this ? >> >>the real solution would be to integrate even more tightly (i.e. >>completely replace) with Jetty's logging. >> >>I'll think about how this might be achieved. >> >> >>Jules >> >> >> >>Jason Dillon wrote: >> >>>I think we should prefix this with org.jboss.<something> so that >>>limiting org.jboss will function as expected. >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Two, two, TWO treats in one. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Two, two, TWO treats in one. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
