I'm a little confused about one part of this...
I thought the plan was to turn our current ejb interceptors into mbean
interceptors and the Containers into fancy MBeanInvokers (If I remember
correctly, anyway the top thing on the mbean interceptor stack). If this
is correct, the ServerInterceptors would be behind the target MBean and not
part of this new factory.
This would look more like
clientproxy -> client-interceptor-stack ->
serverproxy -> targetMbean -> mbean-interceptor-stack
In any case, I think all the stack factories should be mbeans as Hiram
mentions.
david jencks
On 2002.09.12 14:25:25 -0400 Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
> Ok I imagine a client invocation chain will look like:
>
> clientproxy -> client-interceptor-stack ->
> serverproxy -> server-interceptor-stack -> targetMbean
>
> Would doing some think like this satisfy you client-server requirments? :
>
> serverproxy = factory.createAspect("server-interceptor-stack",
> targetMbean);
> clientproxy = factory.createAspect("client-interceptor-stack",
> serverproxy
> );
>
> Please note: that "server-interceptor-stack" in essence will resolve to
> a set of { server-interfaces[], server-interceptors[],
> server-configurations[] }
>
> On another note, right now the factory that generates the proxys for say
> the
> "server-interceptor-stack", is configured through static xml files. If
> we
> provide a JMX interface to the factory so that you can view/update stack
> configurations, would that satisfy your requirement "to have these
> puppies
> manageable."
>
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
>
> >From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: FW: [JBoss-dev] configuration of interceptors
> >Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 13:44:03 -0400
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> > > Behalf Of marc fleury
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:23 PM
> > > To: 'Bill Burke'; 'juha lindfors'; 'Adrian Brock'
> > > Cc: 'Hiram Chirino'; 'Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net'
> > > Subject: [JBoss-dev] configuration of interceptors
> > >
> > >
> > > Ok
> > >
> > > just had an interesting IM with hiram. He essentially has
> > > implemented the proxy factory we were talking about. I think
> > > he is missing the client/server side of it but we can very
> > > simply add these.
> > >
> > > Essentially it would revolve around a central
> > > proxyFactory.createProxy(Interfaces[], client-interceptors[],
> > > client-configurations[], server-interceptors[],
> > > serverconfigurations[] targetMbean);
> > >
> > > that returns a Dynamic Proxy, hooked up for remote/local
> > > calls with client and server side interceptors. If you are
> > > in one vm you can safely assume client=server and only
> > > configure one or the other. (meaning if one is null then
> > > don't configure transport it will be invm
> > > only)
> > >
> > > In the case of hiram he has only one aspect of it (and he
> > > calls it aspect everywhere) but that construct is really what
> > > we need. I also think we should have the "MBean" in there,
> > > even though we are talking about a POJO.
> > >
> > > I believe he has solid code for it and I am really interested
> > > in adding this to the base. I am not sure it is a JMX level
> > > construct (due to the pojo nature) but having the JMX base
> > > manage these configurations and associations between target
> > > and interceptors/configuration is the only sane way I can
> > > imagine to have these puppies manageable. I want visibility
> > > on that configuration for a given mbean (the generalized
> > > mbean againg being just a pojo or target). This is our generalized
> > > proxy factory.
> > >
> > > The AOP framework of the future is staring us in the eye...
> > > we got it.
> > >
> > > marc f
> > >
> > >
> > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Marc Fleury, Ph.D.
> > > President, Founder
> > > JBoss Group, LLC
> > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> > >
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
