> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
> Jencks
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FW: [JBoss-dev] configuration of interceptors
>
>
> I'm a little confused about one part of this...
>
> I thought the plan was to turn our current ejb interceptors into mbean
> interceptors and the Containers into fancy MBeanInvokers (If I remember
> correctly, anyway the top thing on the mbean interceptor stack). If this
> is correct, the ServerInterceptors would be behind the target
> MBean and not
> part of this new factory.
>
> This would look more like
> clientproxy -> client-interceptor-stack ->
> serverproxy -> targetMbean -> mbean-interceptor-stack
>
ya i think this is a better picture..
>
> In any case, I think all the stack factories should be mbeans as Hiram
> mentions.
>
> david jencks
>
>
> On 2002.09.12 14:25:25 -0400 Hiram Chirino wrote:
> >
> > Ok I imagine a client invocation chain will look like:
> >
> > clientproxy -> client-interceptor-stack ->
> > serverproxy -> server-interceptor-stack -> targetMbean
> >
> > Would doing some think like this satisfy you client-server
> requirments? :
> >
> > serverproxy = factory.createAspect("server-interceptor-stack",
> > targetMbean);
> > clientproxy = factory.createAspect("client-interceptor-stack",
> > serverproxy
> > );
> >
> > Please note: that "server-interceptor-stack" in essence will resolve to
> > a set of { server-interfaces[], server-interceptors[],
> > server-configurations[] }
> >
> > On another note, right now the factory that generates the proxys for say
> > the
> > "server-interceptor-stack", is configured through static xml files. If
> > we
> > provide a JMX interface to the factory so that you can
> view/update stack
> > configurations, would that satisfy your requirement "to have these
> > puppies
> > manageable."
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> >
> > >From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Subject: FW: [JBoss-dev] configuration of interceptors
> > >Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 13:44:03 -0400
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> > > > Behalf Of marc fleury
> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:23 PM
> > > > To: 'Bill Burke'; 'juha lindfors'; 'Adrian Brock'
> > > > Cc: 'Hiram Chirino'; 'Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net'
> > > > Subject: [JBoss-dev] configuration of interceptors
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ok
> > > >
> > > > just had an interesting IM with hiram. He essentially has
> > > > implemented the proxy factory we were talking about. I think
> > > > he is missing the client/server side of it but we can very
> > > > simply add these.
> > > >
> > > > Essentially it would revolve around a central
> > > > proxyFactory.createProxy(Interfaces[], client-interceptors[],
> > > > client-configurations[], server-interceptors[],
> > > > serverconfigurations[] targetMbean);
> > > >
> > > > that returns a Dynamic Proxy, hooked up for remote/local
> > > > calls with client and server side interceptors. If you are
> > > > in one vm you can safely assume client=server and only
> > > > configure one or the other. (meaning if one is null then
> > > > don't configure transport it will be invm
> > > > only)
> > > >
> > > > In the case of hiram he has only one aspect of it (and he
> > > > calls it aspect everywhere) but that construct is really what
> > > > we need. I also think we should have the "MBean" in there,
> > > > even though we are talking about a POJO.
> > > >
> > > > I believe he has solid code for it and I am really interested
> > > > in adding this to the base. I am not sure it is a JMX level
> > > > construct (due to the pojo nature) but having the JMX base
> > > > manage these configurations and associations between target
> > > > and interceptors/configuration is the only sane way I can
> > > > imagine to have these puppies manageable. I want visibility
> > > > on that configuration for a given mbean (the generalized
> > > > mbean againg being just a pojo or target). This is our generalized
> > > > proxy factory.
> > > >
> > > > The AOP framework of the future is staring us in the eye...
> > > > we got it.
> > > >
> > > > marc f
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Marc Fleury, Ph.D.
> > > > President, Founder
> > > > JBoss Group, LLC
> > > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > > > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> > http://www.hotmail.com
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jboss-development mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
