jboss tm -- fast. Does not handle distributed (multiple jboss instances) tx. Does not do tx logging, so automated recovery is not really possible.
tyrex tm -- does handle distributed tx and logging. both will handle xa transactions with many participants where there is only one tm instance and nothing crashes. If you need distributed tx (several cooperating tm) or automatic recovery use tyrex. The "distributed" part is nearly done in jboss 4 for the jboss tm: as part of the jca 1.5 support there is a tx import facility. We just need an invoker that has an XAResource in the client half and uses the Work interfaces in the server half. AFAIK no one is working on the logging part, but I don't see why it should be hard. With logging in place I would expect automatic recovery to be fairly simple also but I haven't thought about it much. david jencks On 2002.09.27 09:37:50 -0400 Igor Fedorenko wrote: > Hi, > > Could somebody give brief comparison JBossTX and Tyrex transaction > manager and explain when I should prefer one over another? Thanks in > advance. > > -- > Igor Fedorenko > Think smart. Think automated. Think Dynamics. > www.thinkdynamics.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
