Sorry if I made Corba sound great, because it sucks (that is another 
story).  My beef with web services is that it will be a long time before 
it is a complete framework.  Web services is 80% hype (that is what 
Gosling is bitching about).

-dain

Matt Munz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>   I should probably know better to add to this discussion, but...
> 
>   I am unfamiliar with CORBA, and new to Web Services.  Nonetheless, the
> type of web services (SOAP + UDDI) that we are looking at now seems useful
> to me.  Since I think Web Services is useful, I'm of course interested in
> anything that may be better.
> 
>   For starters, the phrase "Web Services" makes little sense - might as well
> call it Buzzword^2.  Web Services don't exist on the Web, and, under a
> sufficiently general definition, what is not a service?
> 
> 
>>The more that things change, the more they get worse.
> 
> 
>   Things are getting better for me.  I used to get data from third parties
> via http posts & html scraping.  Now I have an API, standards,
> specifications -- a tool set that doesn't dissapear when I try to interact
> with someone else's (unique yet similar) interface.
> 
>   Some of the things I've seen written against the Google and Amazon
> services are impressive.
> 
>   I also find XML-RPC to be useful.  How many different, unique yet similar
> ways do we need to encode requests and responses?  XML makes sense to me for
> data description.
> 
> 
>>Yup! 'Web Services' is just RPC running on an inefficient transport
>>protocol running on an inefficient link protocol, with no mechanism for
>>credential or transaction propogation, and 'best effort' levels of QOS.
> 
> 
>   As I understand it, the transport protocol is interchangeable in most web
> services implementations.  It also seems that many of your objections are
> being addressed in layers on top of SOAP.   The AXIS and JBoss.Net APIs, for
> example, hide much of the implementation details.  They are there if you
> need them, of course...
> 
>   As far as the performance issue is concerned, I only ask my systems to be
> fast enough, and no faster ;) .  XML may be verbose, but it can also be
> compressed.  I have seen a few articles about (compressed) binary encoding
> of XML streams -- I'm interested -- does anyone have any arguments against
> this?
> 
>   So, if CORBA is a Web Services framework, under the broad definition of
> Web Services, what makes it better?  How should I compare?
> 
>   - Matt
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dain
> Sundstrom
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 8:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Gosling has Web Services right...
> 
> 
> It doesn't even have the concept of object identity, so it is even pre
> Corba.  I figure they have about 5 years to catch up with what Corba has
> today. Of course, I think Corba will continue to die the slow death.
> 
> -dain
> 
> danch wrote:
> 
>>Yup! 'Web Services' is just RPC running on an inefficient transport
>>protocol running on an inefficient link protocol, with no mechanism for
>>credential or transaction propogation, and 'best effort' levels of QOS.
>>Oh, by the way - Web Services also exposes a lot of the detail of the
>>protocol to the programmer, just to really piss off the people who
>>though writing then compiling IDL was a pain in the ass. Now, of course,
>>you get to choose between compiling or generating the IDL, which is so
>>chock full of fun little XML quirks as to be unreadable by normal humans
>>anyway.
>>
>>Bah!
>>
>>The more that things change, the more they get worse.
>>
>>-danch
>>
>>Bill Burke wrote:
>>
>>
>>>What I've been saying all along...
>>>
>>>"People have been building Web services under different names for 20
>>>or 30
>>>years," he explains. "We've been building distributed systems for
>>>years out
>>>using CORBA and RMI and all of that."



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to