sorry single container looks like a good idea. It will probably be refactored a bit more to fit in the Aspect stuff.
Bill > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:jboss-development-admin@;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Dain > Sundstrom > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss 4.0 Entity Redesign > > > marc fleury wrote: > > One more request: stateless vs stateful interceptors. It is clear to me > > that both are needed. For example: stateful are easy to code you just > > have your variable in there and it is easy. A good example of stateless > > (taken from invocation) is the "read-ahead" interceptor. The read-ahead > > interceptor lives in the CMP stack (if you coded your CMP stack with > > interceptors). > > You need to have that information from the client. The client can then > > set the "READ-AHEAD" bucket to 3-5 or 20 or whatever it is that he wants > > to display, the invocation carries that information under the > > "READ-AHEAD" value and the interceptor reads it under that value *from > > the invocation*. It is my feeling that this is now a configuration > > thingy passed by the XML files. It is good as is, meaning we need the > > defaults to be configured by the XML file for all the invocations but > > let the Invocation overwrite them. > > > > Bottom line is that I believe the CMP optimization of READ-AHEAD is a > > good example of both coding practices, in fact they show the *need* for > > both. > > CMP will be an set of interceptors so this type of optimization will be > trivial. > > Based on the work I've already done, I think I can eliminate > EntityContainer, StatefullSessionContainer, StatelessSessionContainer > and MessageDrivenContainer and replace all of them with the single > Container class plus some interceptors. I'm not sure about this yet, > but it looks like it will be a simple solution in the end. > > -dain > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future > of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community > Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576301;v?http://www.sun.com /javavote _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576301;v?http://www.sun.com/javavote _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
