> Previously we were on opposite sides of this debate:-) > > I think for simplicity we should have only stateless interceptors, any > interceptor can store per-stack state in a the stack top in a hashmap. >
This was the way I created the aspect stuff initially. The interceptors were tottaly statless. Even intercetor config was not stored in the interceptor. The config was put at the top of the stack. Advantage: 1 interceptor instance could be used for all stack instances. (less memory usage?? not really, the config objects are created and put at the top of the stack) Disadvantages: Hard to develop the interceptors and I think it lead to worse perfomance. I had to do a hashmap look up of the config every time it had to handle an invocation. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Access Your PC Securely with GoToMyPC. Try Free Now https://www.gotomypc.com/s/OSND/DD _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
