Dain Sundstrom wrote: > Bill Burke wrote: > > IMHO, JMX is limiting. MBeans are declarations of object instances. > > standardjboss.xml, standardcmp-jdbc.xml, the new aspect configs, > > etc... are templates/defaultconfigs for object > > creations/instantiations. A major difference. > > > > Sometimes config is just config and there's really no object you can > > attach it to. > > This is one of the big problems I see with Jboss today. Jorg came to me > a few months ago and said I want to use a database for the cmp mapping > info... a data dictionary and I had to say can't be done. We need the > physical storage abstracted away from the server use. We need metadata > to be more configurable at runtime.
What about using JNDI as the storage abstraction for attributes ? Naming services are pretty good ( and desgined for this kind of stuff ), instant integration with LDAP and similar services, there is already a lot of code, etc. I'm trying a similar thing for tomcat - I would be very interested to hear your opinions. Costin ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
