I'm ok with JMS.  I didn't think you could rewrite in such short of time.
Especially with Remoting and AOP just now becoming stable.  I think this
email thread is good because it will allow us to determine whether or not we
can release.  I still think there is enough functionality.

Bill

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Nathan Phelps
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
>
>
>
> I agree that there is some great stuff in there already.  However, being
> that the AOP transaction, security, remoting, etc. was only recently
> released in its first iteration, and the fact that JBoss remoting
> doesn't yet support true callbacks (Jeff says it is coming) there is
> simply no way I can deliver the new JMS implementation BUILT ON TOP of
> these services by May 5th!  And I'm going to be out basically two weeks
> between now and then with customers as I know others will be as well.
>
> Since the whole point of the JMS rewrite is to take advantage of the
> core JBoss AOP services, I haven't really had that much time to do so
> since the services have only recently been released.  Therefore, I
> expect that a May 26th release will ONLY INCLUDE THE OLD JMS CODE which
> is currently in HEAD.  It is the only option with a May 5th deadline in
> my opinion.  If everyone is OK with this and we're committed to that
> date, then I am must immediately shift my attention from the development
> of the new code build on top of the AOP framework to the old code
> currently in HEAD to start working on ensuring JMS 1.1 compliance,
> stability, etc. as well as applying the HTTP IL code currently only in
> Branch_3_2 to HEAD.   Then, after the May 26th release, I'll continue
> working on the new JMS code which is build on top of the AOP framework.
>
> Comments?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nathan
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill
> Burke
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
>
> There's already a lot we can release.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Dain
> > Sundstrom
> > Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:01 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
> >
> >
> > I think you are delusional if you think JB4 will be ready for JavaOne.
> >
> > -dain
> >
> > On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 02:47 PM, marc fleury wrote:
> >
> > > Guys,
> > >
> > > We are thinking a lot about the forthcoming JB4 release.  It is a
> truly
> > > exciting step for us as we believe we will bring a programming
> style,
> > > whose time has come, to a mass audience.
> > >
> > > AOP as Bill says is a clear wave for system level services on par
> with
> > > OOP.  On top of it and also as a proof of how powerful the approach
> is
> > > we still develop a full J2EE server.  Meaning that you can choose to
> > > live in the J2EE world work on JBoss J2EE and access all the
> > > prepackaged
> > > AOP goodies as you have been doing since JBoss2.0.
> > >
> > > There seems to be a lot of fear at SUN from what I can tell in the
> > > press, that we will abandon J2EE.  We love J2EE. When really we will
> > > support J2EE for the forthcoming future.  Never do we talk about
> > > "abandoning" J2EE, we just let the user access core functionality in
>
> > > the
> > > open server and think at the AOP level.  A more fundamental
> construct
> > > of
> > > the framework.
> > >
> > > The reason we are almost there is that it is also a very old
> > > implementation in JBoss.  We have been doing it for a long time but
> > > never talked/packaged it this way.  We make it easy for you to
> leverage
> > > the AOP layer. The implementation is old the way you interact with
> > > JBoss
> > > is new.  It can also be old if you decide to stay at the J2EE level
> > > which will be fully supported.
> > >
> > > But you are now invited to roam in the core JBoss system, in fact
> you
> > > may find it very cozy as you port POJO based applications to JBoss.
> > > There will be a stabilization period though.  We are making an
> > > aggressive push to release JB4 by JavaONE with all our resources
> > > dedicated to implementing the final AOP system aspects and porting
> some
> > > of the existing code to that.
> > >
> > > We're making an aggressive push to release JBoss 4.0 by JavaOne.
> We're
> > > targeting May 26th. That leaves us 2 month from now.
> > >
> > > I REPEAT TARGET FOR JBOSS4.0 DR1   **** MAY 26TH****
> > >
> > >
> > > To meet this aggressive deadline, we need to set some dates.  There
> > > will
> > > be a functionality freeze, Monday, May 5th.  All new functionality
> > > commits after May 5th must be approved by either Scott Stark, or
> Bill
> > > Burke.  We will not branch May 5th, but instead make the month of
> May,
> > > JBoss 4.0 stability en route to a Developpers Release 1 (DR1).
> > >
> > > Please think long and hard and fast about your modules.  Many of you
>
> > > are
> > > involved in core modules that need to move fast in the coming weeks.
> > > Don't be afraid to talk and say who needs help etc.
> > >
> > > PLgC
> > >
> > > marcf
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Marc Fleury, Ph.D.
> > > President, Founder
> > > JBoss Group, LLC
> > > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> > > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
> > > No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated
> server
> > > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Jboss-development mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
> > No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
> > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jboss-development mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
> No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
> http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
> No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
> http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to