Bugs item #796241, was opened at 2003-08-27 20:29 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zds0 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=796241&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Rejected Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jari Juslin (zds0) Assigned to: Alexey Loubyansky (loubyansky) Summary: JBoss throws NPE if CMP int field is NULL in DB Initial Comment: JBoss 3.2.1, Red Hat Linux 6.2, Sun JVM 1.4.2 JBoss throws NullPointerException when it loads CMP entity bean from database if CMP field has type int and there is value NULL in database. This happens at least with EJB 1.1 CMP entity beans. Attached is a patch against JBoss 3.2.1 that fixes this problem by setting the field value to 0 and whining to log. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jari Juslin (zds0) Date: 2003-08-28 14:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=808897 Yep, it _is_ inconsistent then, but if JBoss wants to behave like enterprise level server software, it can't just throw NPE on invalid input and go into half-working state. At least it should throw some reasonable exception describing the problem and letting client application handle the issue in the normal manner. Besides that, NULL values for primitive types are question of synchronizing bean descriptors and database structure. I acknowledge that these _should_ be consistent, but in the real world there is not always a possibility to change the db structure at every point. Especially when starting to use beans in places where DB access has been made with direct JDBC calls before, this kind of things are pretty routine stuff. And I would like migrating to JBoss to be as clean as possible. In fact, one pretty clean solution would be to check on _deploy time_ if DB structure allows NULL values for primitive field. This way JBoss wouldn't hide the problem just to crash later on but let the user correct it before any malfunction can happen. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Alexey Loubyansky (loubyansky) Date: 2003-08-28 11:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=543482 I disagree. NULL value for a primitive type means inconsistent data. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=796241&group_id=22866 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
