I REALLY don't like the generic syntax, but understand it is needed to be able to snap on any type of handler, etc...
BTW, I think your example for per bean type is wrong. It should be: | <bean name="SimpleBean1" | bean="org.jboss.proxy.Proxy"> | <attribute name="interfaces">org.jboss.test.SimpleBean</attribute> | <attribute name="handler"> | <depends name="container:name=somecontainer"/> | </attribute> | </bean> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3861132#3861132 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3861132 ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
