anonymous wrote : | BTW, I think your example for per bean type is wrong. It should be: |
Yes if we are talking about something like an EJB container that has a pooling interceptor or a JMX singleton container. But, for POJO level you will need a different handler instance to identify the instance to the outside world even though they share interceptors. You will notice I have Target as an attribute of the handler rather than the proxy. I believe exposing the full the definition of the container this way enables more configuration choices for the "user". View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3861138#3861138 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3861138 ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
