Ahh. Ok. I misunderstood what you were saying originally. For the callback server, if it is not handling any direct invocations, only callbacks, the I agree that there is no need for a handler to be registered (conceptually).
However, I don't make a distinction, in the implementation, between a normal remoting server that receives direct invocations and one that only receives callbacks. I think that the best way to accomidate for this it to add a new callback server specific implementation that does not require a invocation handler. Have added it as a task in jira ( JBREM-94). Thanks for following up. Sorry I missed the original point. :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3871965#3871965 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3871965 ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
