the issue isn't whether you should or should not declare them. the issue is
what should jBoss do when it detects them.
it can either ignore (which seems to violate RMI-IIOP rules) or give an
error (in which case it should be a meaningful error).
-rg
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jay Walters
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 11:09 AM
> To: 'jBoss'
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] return values in the home interface
> mustbeofval idtypes for RMI/IIOP.
>
>
> You shouldn't be declaring unchecked exceptions in your
> throws clause. It's
> not about throwing them, it's about declaring them. You are
> essentially
> arguing about writing code that says "throws
> NullPointerException". Note
> that this will not conform to the spec either. It is becuase
> you never need
> to declare unchecked exceptions in your throws clause of any
> Java method.
> EJBException and RuntimeException are unchecked. Don't declare them.
>
> Cheers
> Jay Walters
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rhett Guthrie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 11:11 AM
> To: 'jBoss'
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] return values in the home interface must
> beofvalidtypes for RMI/IIOP.
>
>
> well, this is debatable. it is a bug (or maybe just a
> usability issue, not
> so much a bug) if the verifier says that the method fails
> because of its
> return type (when in fact it is failing because of its
> exception type). the
> author of the original email would not have been confused if the error
> message said "Runtime exceptions are not conforming RMI-IIOP exception
> classes."
>
> -rg
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Juha-P Lindfors
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 9:30 AM
> > To: jBoss
> > Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] return values in the home interface must
> > beofvalidtypes for RMI/IIOP.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Rhett Guthrie wrote:
> > > we still have a bug in the verifier.
> >
> > No, we don't. Unchecked exception is not a conforming
> > RMI-IIOP exception
> > class.
> >
> > -- Juha
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
