Peter Antman wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Toby Allsopp wrote:
>> Are you aware of the JSR for JCA 2.0, which adds asynchronous stuff? It
>> also explicitly mentions JMS.
>
> I was not up until to yesterday, when one of the OpenEJB guys told me
> about it. But I already know that the next version would go into JMS
> provider plugability. But how long time will it take before that
> spec is out ? Probably a year.
>
> I do think we can get JMS working as a connector, perhaps with some minor
> JBoss specific code. I know the other server vendors integrates thaire JMS
> offereings tighter into the plattform, therefor JBoss ought to do that to.
Cool. I'm interested to see what you come up with.
>> It might be cool to get JBoss represented in the expert group for this
>> JSR (JSR 112
>> http://java.sun.com/aboutJava/communityprocess/jsr/jsr_112_connector.html).
>> What do you think? Perhaps this is a quesstion for the board.
>
> Yea, I think it would be good fpr JBoss to be represented in a lot of the
> expert group, the same way other vendors and the apache team is. But if
> the JBoss board should have a say in this, I don't know.
The only reason I thought the board might be interested is for JBoss to
be "officially" represented. There's nothing to stop interested
individuals applying, obviously.
> But its kind of tempting to see the link: "I Would like to join this
> expert group" ;-)
Yes, indeed. Unfortunately, I don't really have the time to do much in
this area at the moment.
Toby.
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
