On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 10:06, Alex Loubyansky wrote: > Hello Wouter, > > AFAIK it's still not possible.
If that's right, then this is a pretty fundamental flaw. There are reasons other than managing an m:n relationship for having a field be part of a primary key and a foreign key. If it's true that it can't be done, does anyone kow if it's a priority to fix? It should be. David -- David Whitmarsh Sparkle Computer Co Ltd Systems Development and Consultancy UNIX/LINUX/Windows, C/C++/perl/java Sybase web: www.sparkle-cc.co.uk mob: +44 (0)7802 537097 ==========================================
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
