For the millionth time this is not a flaw, oversight, bug, etc. It is the way I coded it. I knew what I was doing, and I knew some would fine it unacceptable. This is not an easy feature to code, so I decided to delay it until the spec required features were done. I will add it in a future release.
-dain David Whitmarsh wrote: > On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 10:06, Alex Loubyansky wrote: > >>Hello Wouter, >> >>AFAIK it's still not possible. >> > > If that's right, then this is a pretty fundamental flaw. There are > reasons other than managing an m:n relationship for having a field be > part of a primary key and a foreign key. > > If it's true that it can't be done, does anyone kow if it's a priority > to fix? It should be. > > David > > _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
