Frank, Could provide me with some details on how your enabled/configured mod_proxy for Apache?
Thanks, David > Message: 5 > From: "Frank Morton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Jetty and Port 80 > Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:06:14 -0500 > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_001F_01C22667.1839E6D0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > I just use apache's mod_proxy to redirect. > I'm obviously a newbie to JBoss/Jetty. Excuse me if this post=20 > would be better posted elsewhere but I would greatly appreciate=20 > any thoughts on the following problem: > > I'm running Redhat 7.2 which has IPCHAINS enabled by default. I've > tried the suggestions for redirecting traffic=20 > (http://jetty.mortbay.com/jetty/doc/User80.html) as follows: > > /sbin/ipchains -I input --proto TCP --dport 80 -j REDIRECT 8080 > > or: > > /sbin/iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT > --to-port 8080 > > The IPCHAINS option doesn't work apparently because kernel is NOT > compiled with CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE? I don't think I want to recompile > a kernel...sounds pretty heavy duty. > > The IPTABLES option didn't work either, I'm getting the following > error when running iptables: > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] webadmin]# /sbin/iptables -L > /lib/modules/2.4.9-34/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o: > init_module: Device or resource busy > Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, > including invalid IO or IRQ parameters > /lib/modules/2.4.9-34/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o: insmod > /lib/modules/2.4.9-34/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o failed > /lib/modules/2.4.9-34/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o: insmod > ip_tables failed > iptables v1.2.4: can't initialize iptables table `filter': iptables > who? (do you need to insmod?) > Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded. > > Does anybody have any suggestions to get these options to work or > another method to have Jetty/JBoss listen on port 80? > > It seems to me this is a basic functionality that would be used = > extensively=20 > or are people out there using other methods for directing their = > standard > port 80 traffic to JBoss/Jetty on port 8080? > > > Thanks, > David Sica > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Oh, it's good to be a geek. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user