I think you will find that in 1.3 is uses non-persistent HTTP/1.1
Well at least it did a few months ago when I got ganged up on and brow beaten into implementing AJP13 for Jetty/JBoss. But it does work. cheers Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > Actually, on inspecting the documentation of Apache 1.3, you are correct > (please ignore my last email). > > "This module implements a proxy/cache for Apache. It implements proxying > capability for FTP, CONNECT (for SSL), HTTP/0.9, HTTP/1.0, and (as of Apache > 1.3.23) HTTP/1.1. The module can be configured to connect to other proxy > modules for these and other protocols. > This module was experimental in Apache 1.1.x. As of Apache 1.2, mod_proxy > stability is greatly improved. > > Warning: Do not enable proxying with ProxyRequests until you have secured > your server. Open proxy servers are dangerous both to your network and to > the Internet at large." > > > > Tom Veldhouse > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Larry Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Greg Wilkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 9:54 AM > Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Apache 1.3 and JBOSS 3.0.2 (w/tomcat or w/jetty) > > > >>mod_proxy definitely supports HTTP/1.1 (see >>http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mod_proxy.html). Does this imply > > that > >>it also supports keep-alives? >> >>Also, with mod_rewrite, we have configured apache to serve up static > > content > >>even within password-protected portions of the web-app. With mod_jk, it >>always does authentication checks. I'm not sure how much performance that >>buys us, but it is something. >> >>Another config that may affect these numbers: the default apache ssl > > config > >>includes the following: >>SetEnvIf User-Agent ".*MSIE.*" \ >> nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown \ >> downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0 >> >>This forces all access from MS IE via https to downgrade to http/1.0. I >>have played around with this, and sure enough, without this, IE > > periodically > >>shows blank pages while browsing secure pages. This configuration was in >>place for both mod_jk and mod_proxy tests. >> >>Regardless, the numbers we have obtained speak very clearly to us. Please >>respond if you find that your benchmarks show something else - I would > > love > >>to make my site go faster! >> >>In the words of Mr. Schaefer: Have Fun! >> >>-Larry >> >> >>>I think that benchmarking that shows mod_proxy as faster than mod_jk >>>is highly suspect. >>> >>>While mod_jk does faff about a lot - changing strings into single >>>bytes and then back again, mod_proxy does not use persistent connectons >> >>and must >> >>>reestablish a TCP/IP connection for each request. >>> >>>I would only expect mod_proxy to be faster if the load presented was >>>HTTP/1.0 or not kept-alive HTTP/1.1 >>> >>>If mod_proxy does now support HTTP/1.1 persistent connections, then that >>>is very good news as it is a much better way to forward requests (use >> > the > >>>protocol rather than invent a new one!). >>> >>>cheers >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>Larry Sanderson wrote: >>> >>>>These are consistant with our results. We use mod_proxy and >>> > mod_rewrite > >>in >> >>>>production becaus it has given us a consistent performance edge over >>> > the > >>>>alternatives (mod_jk, no apache, etc...). Unfortunaty, last I >>> > checked, > >>Tux >> >>>>does not support ssl, so that was not an option for us. >>>> >>>>-Larry >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>As of Apache 1.3.23 I think, Apache supports HTTP/1.1 compliance in >>>> > it's > >>>>>mod_proxy mechanism, meaning it can take advantage of persistent >>>>>connections. That goes for the 2.x series of Apache as well. >>>>> >>>>>Using Apache 1.3.26, JBoss 2.4.4 and several different JSP/Servlet >>>> >>engines >> >>>>>(Tomcat 3.2.4, Jetty 3.0,3.1, and Resin 2.0.5) I performed many load >>>> >>tests >> >>>>>using LoadRunner against the above configurations. However, for each >>>>>scenario, I tested once using mod_jk w/ ajp13 connector and a second >>>> >>time >> >>>>>using mod_rewrite and mod_proxy passing off to the http listener of >>>> >>>>whatever >>>> >>>> >>>>>jsp/servlet engine that was running. In _every_ example, the use of >>>>>mod_rewrite and mod_proxy together improved performance over using >>>>>mod_jk/ajp13. And this is in an application that uses Struts heavily. >>>> > I > >>>>am >>>> >>>> >>>>>currently setting up a configuration with Tomcat 4.0.3 so I can try >>>> >>>>testing >>>> >>>> >>>>>with mod_webapp and see how it performs. >>>>> >>>>>I then found even better performance on Linux, by using the TUX kernel >>>> >>web >> >>>>>server in place of Apache and passing on all non-static requests on to >>>> >>the >> >>>>>specific jsp/servlet container being used at the time. >>>>> >>>>>As a result, I would have to say that my testing reveals that using >>>> > the > >>>>>latest Apaches with mod_proxy will out perform the mod_jk scenarios. >>>>> >>>>>Thanks, >>>>>Mike >>>>> >>>>>----- Original Message ----- >>>>>From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Apache 1.3 and JBOSS 3.0.2 (w/tomcat or >>>> >>w/jetty) >> >>>>>Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 22:48:32 -0500 >>>>>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> >>>>>This link points to an area that really applies to Apache2 and mod_jk2 >>>> >>(or >> >>>>>proxy which has disadvantages). I was under the impression it (Jetty) >>>> >>>>would >>>> >>>> >>>>>work with mod_jk and Apache 1.3. >>>>> >>>>>J. Michael Savage >>>>>Datastream Development >>>>> >>>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>(800) 955-6775 x7646 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old >>>>>cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! >>>>>https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 >>>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>>JBoss-user mailing list >>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user >>>>> >>>> >>> >>>-- >>>Greg Wilkins<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Phone/fax: +44 7092063462 >>>Mort Bay Consulting Australia and UK. http://www.mortbay.com >>> >>> >> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old >>cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! >>https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 >>_______________________________________________ >>JBoss-user mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user >> > -- Greg Wilkins<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Phone/fax: +44 7092063462 Mort Bay Consulting Australia and UK. http://www.mortbay.com ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
