a jca adapter for your file based content store should be fine. jca really deals with expensive connections that involve transactions and security. If none of these apply you may be able to get away with something simpler such as an mbean.
david jencks On 2002.09.21 22:55:21 -0400 Kevin O'Neill wrote: > > What I did to replace an rmi server for now is have session beans > access a > > singleton. It seems the safest way to set up a service right now and > still > > be somewhat portable... > > Isn't accessing threading facilities a no no in session beans? If you > have a deamon like service then I assume that it's multi threaded, so is > calling your singleton in effect breaking the ejb rules? > > How do other people deal with this. I've recently had the need to access > a file based content store from session beans and considered creating a > jca module. Is this the right way to do it? > > -k. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user > > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
