We are missing support for SUM and COUNT sql-function as well as subqueries in CMP, which hibernate have. This has forced us into using pure sql for this part to get it reasonable fast.
Also you don't need all dataobjects and interfaces in hibernate, so we should try it soon, nut it would be nice too see a performance comparison with CMP, hibernate, JDO and OJB. We are not satisfied with whe performance of CMP and only pure SQL had probably have been faster (although jboss is supposed to have cache). -- Marius Kotsbak Boost communications AS www.boostcom.no On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:03:12AM -0500, LaBanca, Rick wrote: > > A bit off topic, but I need to ask those who have explored... > > Has anyone here used hibernate in preference to cmp? If so how has it worked > out for you in jboss? We are considering it or cmp. Hibernate certainly > seems more flexible, but I was thinking it doesn't abstract the app from the > data as much as cmp forces you to. > > Our application has fairly straightforward tables and relations, typical > ecommerce type data, no big transaction concerns. I guess my main question > is this, is hibernate better, or does it come down to just a different > method than cmp (ie a strong argument for using a standard api vs > hibernate). > > Rick > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
