This is somewhat the mirror image of relational database at the same level of maturity: they were great for queries, but navigational access sucked.
-danch
Eric Kaplan wrote:
Maybe things have changed recently, but I think the biggest thing against them (besides some of their obscene pricing policies - read ObjectStore) was their poor performance querying across very large sets of data compared to their stodgy relational counterparts.They were stillborn because they fell apart under certain conditions. Eric -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan Christopherson Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Cmp vs hibernate Matthew Baird wrote:couple notes: - try selling an enterprise level application that doesn't support a "standard" rdbms on the backend (oracle/sql server/db2)Probably the second biggest thing (after fear of change) that caused ODBMS's to be stillborn: "Will <insert corporate standard reporting tool> work with it? No!?!?! How do you expect to sell it?" -danch
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
