On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 10:32, Marek Lange wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi Adrian,
> > 
> > Does your statement imply that any work done either directly or
> > indirectly by an MDB (such as, for example, accessing Entity Beans)
> > requries an XA datasource?
> 
> I asked the same question some weeks ago and David replied:
> 
> "I don't know what the Oracle error means, but you do not need an xa
> datasource for jbossmq xa.  In fact the jbossmq xa jdbc connections are set
> to autocommit while in use by jbossmq, as it handles transactions
> independently of the database."
> 
> Can someone clarify?
> 

You are talking about something else.

That is the jdbc2 persistence manager that is used internally
by the server. It only requires a local transaction (which it
starts itself, suspending/resuming any existing transaction).

This thread is about db connections used by the application
in the same transaction as MDB message delivery. 

> -marek
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
> Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
-- 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user

Reply via email to