Hello, thanks for the reply jasong!
I am very sorry... the included WSDL part was not correct. It should not contain the "qualified" attributes should not be there. I did copy the part from the wrong WSDL file. The correct WSDL should be like this (again, I am sorry :) : | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | <definitions name="FleetAPI" targetNamespace="http://bullen.com/fleet/api"; xmlns:tns="http://bullen.com/fleet/api"; xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:ns2="http://bullen.com/fleet/api/types"; xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/"; xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/";> | <types> | <schema targetNamespace="http://bullen.com/fleet/api/types"; xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:soap11-enc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"; xmlns:tns="http://bullen.com/fleet/api/types"; xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";> | | ... | | <complexType name="getBurro3Response"> | <sequence> | <element name="result" nillable="true" type="string"/></sequence></complexType> | By the way, what does it mean, qualified/unqualified and how did you see that the SOAP request was not qualified? Best regards, Georg Ps. I tried even though to set them "unqualified" but then the client could not even parse the WSDL file... Jikes! ds. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3871005#3871005 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3871005 ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
