"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Yes, it will *not* persist anything, unless you | (a) enable CacheLoaderFetchPersistentState and | (b) have a CacheLoader. | | We're talking pure in-memory state transfer So would an enhancement that allowed a cache with a unshared cache loader to persist transient state upon joining a cache cluster be a feasible idea/alternative? Do the example changes I sent make sense in that regard?
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3873775#3873775 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3873775 ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
