anonymous wrote : First, it looks like the transition object is only @In, not @In @Out. But it's pretty clear that myActionListener is trying to communicate some state outwards to the conversation. So why not @Out also? Or is @Out only for cases where new contextual objects might be outjected (as opposed to just side-effecting existing ones)?
Right, this is a byvalue/byreference question. You can change the state of an @In-jected object by calling its method. This is not side-effecty. It is how any variable in Java works :-) anonymous wrote : Second, is it assumed that there is only one unique @In Transition field in the bean? Is that always a good assumption? It seems a little fragile. By definition, there is a unique instance of the Seam component named "transition" in your conversation context. It don't matter how many times you inject it, it will always be the same one. Until you switch conversations, that is ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3914658#3914658 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3914658 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ JBoss-user mailing list JBoss-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
