Let's go with some Hen-puts-neck-on-the-line-answers. On 9/22/05, Smuts, Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If Jisp is GPL, then I'll cut it out in the next day or so. It was only > in an experimental directory as an optional plugin and never seemed to > work very well anyway.
Jisp 2.5.1 is good to use. The licence looks okay to me, and I didn't get any negatives on the legal-discuss list; just didn't get a lot terribly positive either. However someone pointed out that there were substantial improvements in the newer version, but while you'll want to move to that, it's GPL and we can't touch it. So I imagine you'll want to kill the Jisp bit, you can't use 3.x, but the current 2.5.x usage is not a legal problem. > The jgroups is now in a directory called jdk1.4 extensions along with a > Berkeley DB disk cache plugin. We can keep both out of the distribution > for now. Definitely must be kept out of the distribution. I see a directory called auxiliary-builds containing two sub-directories: # javagroups/ # jdk14/ Any idea what the licence is on javagroups? (that directory has a project.xml that depends on javagroups). My google attempts get mixed up with jgroups. The good news is that the jgroups stuff is optional, this should be allowed soon I think and I'm going to take an active attitude with the board and inform them that we have this and are not planning to remove the code currently. The bdb stuff is fine I think as long as we obey their licence (which looks like we have to make sure we document how to get their source in a clear manner). > The core of JCS should have almost no dependencies outside of Jakarta > except for util concurrent. Always good. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
