On 8/12/2010 1:48 PM, Jim Newsham wrote:
On 8/12/2010 12:59 PM, Jim Newsham wrote:
Would you be willing to run the same test on the jdbm2 codebase? It
would interesting to know if the problem exists in both places (if
it does, it would give at least a hint of where the problem is
coming from).
Sure, I'll give that a try.
Ok I'm running the same test for jdbm2 right now. There were some
very minor api changes, but basically the same code. I'll report back
on the results when I have them. I immediately noticed that the
check() method runs in faster -- in 10ms as opposed to 25ms for jdbm1.
The jdbm2 test has been running for 26,845 iterations and counting. No
problem yet. Interestingly, the db files total 1.6mb, whereas the jdbm1
test files were 90mb after 12,500 iterations.
I'm going to let it continue to run.
Jim
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Jdbm-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jdbm-general
