|
Yes - my understanding is that the jdbm2 files are much, much more efficiently managed than the jdbm1 files (and a lot faster as well).
I'll be interested to see if you experience any corruption along that front. I realize that this isn't exactly what you wanted to hear (looking for a single-file solution)... Thanks for running the test.
- K
----------------------- Original Message -----------------------
From: Jim Newsham <[email protected]>
Cc:
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:42:17 -1000
Subject: Re: [Jdbm-general] Fwd: re: jdbm2 mailing list; jdbm corruption
On 8/12/2010 12:59 PM, Jim Newsham wrote:Sure, I'll give that a try. The jdbm2 test has been running for 26,845 iterations and counting. No problem yet. Interestingly, the db files total 1.6mb, whereas the jdbm1 test files were 90mb after 12,500 iterations. I'm going to let it continue to run. Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________
Jdbm-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jdbm-general |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Jdbm-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jdbm-general
