> >IMHO (please correct me if i say nonsens) it seems there is > >a little bit > >develoment-stagnancy for JDEBug??!! > > Absolutely, about a year ago, the advent of semantic plus a host of > contributions from JDE users diverted my attention from > JDEbug. I have > felt very bad all along about neglecting JDEbug, which I regard as > basically an early beta version, and have been anxious all > along to get > back to it. But the recent string of reports of JDEbug > hanging at startup > plus the absence of feature requests and comments (contrasted > with the many > requests in the editing area) made me wonder if anyone was > using JDEbug > and, if not, whether it was worthwhile investing any further time in > JDEbug. Your response plus that of many others has renewed my > determination > to develop JDEbug into a robust and easy-to-use debugging tool. This would be great! If JDEBug enhances to this robust and easy-to-use debugging tool, then IMHO the combination of Emacs, JDE, semantic, JDEBug and ECB (a little bit act of promoting for our Emacs Code browser :-) needn´t conceal oneself behind any commercial product in contrary it´s much better and much more (easy, means not only for hardcore Emacser!) customizable to personal tastes as the other IDE´s. Of course some of them are not bad and have really nice features (e.g. JBuilder) but over all considered...No Chance! :-)
